Info
Featured In
Media Badges

by

The Brooklyn, Kings County, District Attorney’s Office has announced that a Grand Jury indicted three individuals for Grand Larceny in the Second Degree for allegedly bilking the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) out of approximately $150,000. According to the press release, Jacqueline Jackson, a NYCTA supervisor, John Headley, an assistant district attorney who served under Charles Hynes in Brooklyn from 1991 to 1995, and Joyce Ilarraza, a former New York City Corrections Officer, are named on two separate indictments.

As a supervisor at NYCTA, Jackson’s responsibilities included overseeing a staff of ten. Her responsibilities included setting up independent medical examinations for individuals who were suing NYCTA. Headley, no longer a prosecutor, had his own firm, Advance IME Co. This company provided the Torts Division of the NYCTA Law Department with independent medical examinations. Additionally, if necessary, Headley’s company also provided medical records and expert witnesses at trial. It is alleged that from from 2007 through 2008, Jackson instructed her staff to direct business to Advance IME Co. and to approve billing and invoices to Headley’s company. As a result, prosecutors contend that $98,000 was stolen from NYCTA. In return for this business, Headley allegedly paid for Jackson’s personal expenses including her electric and gas bills.

Continue reading

by

Robert Halderman, the man who was accused by prosecutors of extorting and blackmailing “Late Show” host David Letterman, finally gave up on his concocted “screenplay” defense and pleaded to Attempted Grand Larceny by Extortion in Manhattan Supreme Court. In return for his plea, Mr. Halderman will be sentenced to six months in jail (he will serve roughly four months with good time) along with one thousand hours of community service and probation. This type of sentence involving probation and jail is commonly referred to in the practice of criminal law as a “split.”

Although he has yet to be sentenced, this plea marks the end of a ongoing saga for Mr. Halderman, Mr. Letterman and the employee who was in the middle of the conflict. I am confident there will be ample speculation as to why both a relatively low plea recommendation was made and why Mr. Halderman accepted such a plea (Mr. Halderman had faced no minimum term of incarceration, but up to 5 to 15 years in state prison). That being said, I believe Mr. Halderman and his attorney recognized that the “screenplay defense” wasn’t going to fly. Moreover, instead of recommending a state prison sentence where Mr. Halderman would have had no other choice but to take the case to trial, the prosecution may have wanted to spare Mr. Letterman and the employee any further embarrassment.

Continue reading

by

Whether a vehicle is stolen or being driven without permission of the owner, one particular crime that may be charged in New York is Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Second and Third Degrees pursuant to New York Penal Law sections 165.06 and 165.05 respectively. While other crimes may have been perpetrated, such as Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, an “E” felony punishable by up to four years in state prison, Unauthorized Used of a Vehicle, the “joyriding statute,” is defined as follows: NY PL 165.05(1) – Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Third Degree

A person is guilty of Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Third Degree when knowing that he does not have the consent of the owner, he takes, operates, exercises control over, rides in or otherwise uses a vehicle. A person who engages in any such conduct without the consent of the owner is presumed to know that he does not have such consent

Continue reading

by

Michael Archer, better known as D’Angelo, was arrested over the weekend and charged with Patronizing a Prostitute in the Third Degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law 230.04. Cops arrested the R&B star after he allegedly solicited an undercover cop posing as a prostitute in Manhattan and offered her $40 (yup, forty bucks) for her services. Although it is an “A” misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail, it is highly unlikely D’Angelo will serve any time.

While D’Angleo will probably end up steering clear of this rap, Lil Wayne, a/k/a, Dwayne Carter, was not so lucky. Earlier today he was finally sentenced to jail in connection to his plea for possessing a firearm in New York without the requisite permit. Unlike state prison where one does more time before one is eligible for parole, it is likely that Lil Wayne will get out of jail well before his year sentence is up. In fact, with good behavior he may get out in time for Thanksgiving 2010 where D’Angelo could spot him $40 for a turkey.

Continue reading

by

The Queens County District Attorney’s Office keeps churning out high profile white collar fraud cases. Unfortunately for Matthew McEntee and Mariwa M. Mora, two Flushing residents, these two defendants are awaiting arraignment after they were arrested in connection to an alleged fraud scheme involving $16 million in assets.

According to the Queens District Attorney’s Office press release, Mr. McEntee, wrongfully portraying himself to be an attorney, and Ms. Mora, allegedly scammed twelve property owners out of $16 million in assets including properties in New York, Pennsylvania, Texas and California. “[A] ccording to the criminal charges, an unapprehended individual introduced McEntee to the victims as an investor who was looking to buy properties for his corporations – Clarity Corporate Trust and Conveyance Corporate Trust. During the introductions, McEntee allegedly claimed to be an attorney, an accountant and a banker and introduced Mora as either his fiancee or wife. In some cases, it is alleged, while negotiating the cash sales of the properties, McEntee also offered to buy the victims’ high-end vehicles – such as Mercedes Benzs, Mustangs and SUVs – and expensive house furnishings. McEntee also allegedly told some of the victims that for corporate tax reasons if they brought money or other valuables to the closing, he would issue them a check for double the value which would be in the payment check for the properties. In each instance, the certified corporate checks drawn on an HSBC bank account that the defendants allegedly provided to the victims at the closings were deemed forged.”

Continue reading

by

Only days ago, I published an entry regarding the new Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. Having served as a member of that bureau’s predecessor, the Identity Theft Unit, during my seven years as a prosecutor under Robert Morgenthau, I commented on the necessity of such a unit despite my adversarial role as a New York criminal defense attorney. I don’t think anyone could argue the significance of this expanded bureau as schemes involving Identity Theft and Computer Crime continue to flourish in New York and beyond.

Although the most recent arrests and allegations stem from the Queens County District Attorney’s Office, the purpose of such a unit or bureau has once again been made clear. According to the Queens County District Attorney’s Office, twelve individuals, including five employees at PC Richards and Sons, have been arrested and indicted in a fraudulent credit card “bust out” scheme. The 92 count indictment charges Raza Chaudry, Reema Chaudry, Tahir Chaudry, Azadar Chaudry, Zishan Chaudry, Shaheen Akhtar. Hemet Adnand, Mathew Alli, Mohammad Aslam, David Francis, Benzy Jonny and Sheikh “Naveed” Zaheer with crimes including Grand Larceny, Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, Falsifying Business Records and Offering a False Instrument for Filing. Although they are not charged with the technical crime of Identity Theft, it is alleged that the “bust out” scheme involved stolen social security numbers. According to the Queens District Attorney’s Office, a search warrant resulted in the recovery of “Pakistani passports belonging to several of the defendants and bearing multiple names and dates of birth, blank Social Security cards, Canadian and New York driver’s licenses and binders containing in excess of 300 credit cards.”

Continue reading

by

Like identity theft crimes, cybercrimes and computer related offenses are becoming more prevalent in New York. In fact, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has a unit, the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau, whose main focus is to prosecute this criminal activity. One particular crime, among many, that may be established with relative ease by prosecutors is the crime of Computer Trespass pursuant to New York Penal Law section 156.10. Computer Trespass is defined as follows:

A person is guilty of Computer Trespass when he or she knowingly uses, causes to be used, or accesses a computer, computer service, or computer network without authorization and:

Continue reading

by

According to a Manhattan District Attorney’s Office press release, the New York County District Attorney has announced the formation of another “new” bureau. District Attorney Vance’s Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau technically ratchets up the current Identity Theft Unit to formally add the investigation and prosecution of cybercrime. In reality, many of the prosecutors assigned to the Major Case Section of the Identity Theft Unit had already been investigating and prosecuting these crimes. However, District Attorney Vance is taking the necessary steps to expand the unit into a bureau. Additionally, District Attorney Vance is increasing the number of prosecutors who will “specialize” in this area while further training them in this dynamic area of criminality and law.

From the perspective of law enforcement, a bureau such as this is a much needed arm of the District Attorney’s Office. The original unit, founded by two outstanding attorneys and prosecutors no longer with the office, was on the forefront of cybercrime and identity theft investigations when it was created in 2004. Having been one of the original prosecutors assigned to the Identity Theft Unit and the Major Case Section upon their respective creations, I not only learned from these two prosecutors and obtained training in forensics and the investigation of computer crimes, but witnessed firsthand the ease by which these crimes were perpetrated and the creativity of those who sought to benefit from this criminality. The transition of this unit into the new bureau not only displays District Attorney Vance’s recognition of the magnitude of these types of crimes, but is a testament to the dedication, work and efforts of the two founders of the unit as well as those currently working there, to bring the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office into the new era of identity theft and cybercrime investigations.

Continue reading

by

According to various media sources, White Plains Mayor and former Assemblyman Adam Bradley has been arraigned in White Plains City Court after he was arrested for the crime of Assault in the 3rd Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law section 120.00. It is alleged that the politician got into a dispute with his wife, grabbed her arm, put her finger in the area of the door frame and closed the door. As a result, it is alleged that his wife sustained an injury to her finger.

Although the reports do not appear to indicate Mrs. Adams suffered a serious injury, as I noted in a previous blog entry, when one uses a dangerous instrument (a door can constitute as such) to perpetrate the crime of Assault in the Third Degree, the offense can be elevated to a “D” felony of Assault in the Second Degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law section 120.05(2). This crime is punishable by up to seven years in state prison as opposed to the misdemeanor which carries a maximum sentence of one year.

Continue reading

by

The NY criminal defense attorneys and former Manhattan prosecutors at Saland Law PC have handled a significant number of Desk Appearance Tickets (DATs) and “pink” summonses for our clients. In Manhattan, these cases are often dealt with at 100 Centre Street, 346 Broadway (“pink” ticket / summons court) or at Midtown Community Court. Whether the summons or Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) charges you with Shoplifting Petit Larceny (NY PL 155.25 or NY PL 165.40), Marijuana (NY PL 221.10), Drug Possession (NY PL 220.03), Theft of Services (NY PL 165.15), Assault (NY PL 120.00), Trespass (NY PL 140.10), or even Disorderly Conduct (NY PL 240.20), the ramifications of mishandling the Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) is no different than if you were arrested, booked and put through the criminal justice system. That means, you can still end up with a criminal record even though you were merely given a “ticket” for a criminal act.

For the purpose of today’s entry, I will discuss the differences between the potential Manhattan courts that deal with these charges. Again, a Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) or “pink ticket” summons in Manhattan is returnable to 100 Centre Street, Midtown Community Court or 346 Broadway.

Continue reading

Contact Information
52 Duane St 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Office: 212.312.7129Fax: 212.918.9375
By appointment only
50 Main St #1000
White Plains, NY 10606
By appointment only
254 S Main St #500
New City, NY 10956
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Saland Law PC
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design