New York Criminal Lawyer Blog

July 14, 2010

New York Penal Law 145.65: What is an “Instrument” for the Purposes of Possession of Graffiti Instruments

Although not often litigated by New York criminal defense lawyers where a client is charged with Possession of Graffiti Instruments, pursuant to New York Penal Law section 145.65, it is important to understand or identify what constitutes a “graffiti instrument.” Certainly, some tools are obvious. Cans of spray paint, markers, etc. are obvious “graffiti instruments” in the right circumstances. Yet, why are those objects “graffiti instruments” and what is the basis of that definition?

New York Penal Law 145.65 sets forth that one is guilty of Possession of Graffiti Instruments when one possess any instrument (even a substance or solution) designed or commonly used to etch, paint, cover or draw upon property. The definition is further expanded to address permission or authority to make such marks and circumstances evincing the intent to damage the property of another. These terms put together establish graffiti instruments.

July 10, 2010

Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Fifth Degree (NY PL 220.06(5)): Must the Cocaine be 500 Pure Milligrams or 500 Aggregate Milligrams

by Jeremy Saland

A common felony offense charged by police and defended by New York criminal defense lawyers in the arena of controlled substance, narcotic and drug crimes, is Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the 5th Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law section 220.06(5). A serious crime involving the possession of cocaine, CPCS 5th Degree is a “D” felony punishable from one year to two and a half years in state prison for a first time offender. Obviously, if you are a “predicate felon” you will face more time in state prison. Fortunately, due to changes in the Rockefeller Drug Laws, there are potential ways to avoid state prison that should be discussed with your New York criminal defense attorney.

Having briefly addressed the ramifications of New York Penal Law 220.06(5), the following entry will take a step back and (1) define the offense as it relates to cocaine possession and (2) discuss whether the 500 milligrams is an aggregate weight or a pure weight measurement.

July 4, 2010

New York Drunk Driving – DWI / DUI – Primer: New York Criminal Laws & Criminal Defense

by Jeremy Saland

The first defense to any drunk driving charge is simple. Don’t do it. Unfortunately, we all have and will continue to make mistakes whether they are criminal in nature or not. In the realm of criminal law, however, a mistake made by a a good and honest person is often magnified exponentially. Regardless of how it came to be, a charge or allegation of Driving While Intoxicated (DWI / DUI) in New York is a serious offense codified in Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL) 1192. While the following is not an in depth analysis of the DWI / DUI laws in New York State, the offenses listed below are some of the most common charges:

VTL 1192.1 – Driving While Ability Impaired

July 2, 2010

Fake & Fraudulent Drug Prescriptions in New York: The Crimes of Forgery and Criminal Possession of a Forged instrument

by Jeremy Saland

Maybe you stole a couple of sheets from a physician’s prescription pad and made out a completely fake prescription for drugs and medicine such as Vicodin, Oxycodone or OxyContin. Maybe you altered your doctor’s legitimate prescription by increasing the dosage or amount of Xanax, Adderall or Ritalin. Regardless of how the fraudulent prescription is drafted, as long as it is in fact altered you may face the “D” felonies of Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree or Forgery in the Second Degree.

If you actually drafted, created or altered the prescription fraudulently, a likely charge you will face is Forgery in the Second Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law 170.10(5). Often times, however, the police and prosecutors do not catch the person in the act of the alteration. Instead, either a search of a vehicle, a person’s clothing or even the retrieval of the forged prescription from a pharmacist will result in a charge of Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law 170.25. Regardless of which offense is charged, a conviction for these felonies is punishable by up to seven years in state prison.

June 28, 2010

DA: $1.1 Million Tax Refund Fraud Scheme Lands Accountant, Her Family and Male Model Client in Jail

by Jeremy Saland

The tax man comes for everyone. Seems like the Queens District Attorney does so as well. While the New York taxing authorities take their payment in money, District Attorney’s Offices seek not just your money, but your freedom as well. Unfortunately for Diana Rabin, an accountant, her mother Lyidmila Levy, sister Alisa Derabin and clients Merced R. Baumer and Nyemah Johnson, they are now facing up to fifteen years in state prison for allegedly attempting to obtain a combined $1.1 million in New York State tax refunds.

Not only are the defendants alleged to have claimed hundreds of thousands of dollars in income, but tens of thousands of dollars in taxes withheld from this purported income. According to the District Attorney’s Office, this income was made up as some of the defendants did not even work.

June 26, 2010

Official Misconduct (New York Penal Law 195.00): Crime, Punishment and Your Criminal Defense

by Jeremy Saland

Not to be mistaken with Rewarding Official Misconduct (New York Penal Law 200.20), Official Misconduct (New York Penal Law 195.00), is a unique crime prosecuted in New York associated with public servants (defined below). Official Misconduct occurs as follows:

When a public servant has the intent to obtain a benefit or deprive another person of a benefit, he:

June 22, 2010

DA: Fake Attorney Dupes Three Mexican Immigrants Out of $12K for Promise of Green Cards

by Jeremy Saland

New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr. is following his predecesor’s commitment to not only cleaning up crime in the streets, but fraud in the suites as well. This mantra does not stop with white collar crime and DA Vance appears to be ready to build upon the principles and objectives of the Immigrant Affairs Program established under Robert Morgenthau. In fact, DA Vance announced yesterday an indictment of Teresa Nora Martinez for allegations of immigration fraud. If this case and others are any indication, DA Vance is fed up and displeased (dare I say incensed ?) with alleged swindlers and scammers in the arena of immigration fraud. According to the DA, Ms. Martinez stole $12,000 from immigrants after informing them she was an attorney or was associated with attorneys who could assist them with their immigration issues.

The District Attorney press release states as follows:

June 21, 2010

Charged with Felony Forgery & Forged Instrument Crimes, Accused Avoids Criminal Record and Pleads to Disorderly Conduct Violation

by Jeremy Saland

Although it took months of wrangling, the New York criminal defense attorneys at Saland Law PC are pleased that our client was able to avoid a criminal record after being arrested and charged with felony Forgery (New York Penal Law 170.10) and felony Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument (New York Penal Law 170.25). Prosecutors had alleged that our client, an employee of doctor at a New York City Hospital, stole sheets of a prescription pad belonging to that physician and drafted a prescription for Oxycodone. This prescription was allegedly presented to a pharmacy where it was determined by staff that the doctor’s signature did not match prior prescriptions. Additionally, staff at the pharmacy questioned the number of Oxycodone pills requested.

After advising the prosecution of the facts of the case, providing a “package” about the client and supplying other factors to law enforcement, the prosecution ultimately agreed to dismiss the felony counts and permit our client to plead guilty to Disorderly Conduct (a violation and not a crime). Currently a nursing student, our client will now be able to proceed with her career and without the scarlet letter of a criminal conviction.

June 17, 2010

DA Vance, Jr Announces $1.9 Million Settlement with Distributors of Illegal Knives in New York

by Jeremy Saland

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr. is trying to be more proactive when it comes to crimes involving knives. Last year, In Manhattan alone, there were 2,269 arrests involving the possession of illegal knives. Mere possession of certain weapons such as “gravity knives” and “switchblades” is punishable as an “A” misdemeanor pursuant to New York Penal Law 265.01 – Criminal Possession of a Weapon on the Fourth Degree.

According to the District Attorney’s website, DA Vance, Jr. has reached an agreement with national and local retailers of knives that are illegal in New York. Retailers, such as Home Depot, Eastern Mountain Sports, Paragon Sports, and four others, will enter into deferred prosecution agreements. The law permits these companies, like individuals, to be prosecuted for crimes – a fact recently addressed by DA Vance in an earlier press release. In return, these companies will provide the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office the past four year’s profit. In total, that amount is approximately $1.9 million. Additionally, the companies will finance an education campaign regarding illegal knives. Lastly, Frederico Gebauer, a managing director at Kroll, Inc. and former Manhattan prosecutor, will serve free of charge as the District Attorney’s “Knife Sales Monitor” to review and keep track of knife sales. Hopefully, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office recognizes that many upstanding people who possessed knives for legitimate purposes, such as for work, purchased these knives from these and other stores assuming (with good reason) that there was nothing illegal about it.

June 17, 2010

New York Penal Law 265.01(1): Is a “Butterfly Knife” Considered a “Gravity Knife” in Violation of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree

by Jeremy Saland

The New York criminal defense attorneys and former Manhattan prosecutors at Saland Law PC routinely get telephone calls from or represent individuals charged with Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree in violation of New York Penal Law 265.01. Often times the story starts off the same. Not knowing it was crime to possess certain knives, a person is stopped after the police observe the clip of a knife outside their pocket. Ultimately, a knife is recovered and the police claim that the knife is a “gravity knife.” Whether their arrest is in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens or anywhere in New York, the crime is the same. That is, Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail. It makes no difference if the person is issued a NY Desk Appearance Ticket, put through the arrest process or it is their first brush with the law.

As I have noted in the past, New York Penal Law 265.01(1) is a per se offense, meaning, the possession of certain weapons is an automatic crime. Possession of a “gravity knife” is one of the specified weapons regardless if your intended use was for work or protection. Having said that, one imperative step, which is fairly obvious, is to ascertain if in fact the alleged “gravity knife” is in fact a “gravity knife.” As both a prosecutor and a New York criminal defense lawyer I have seen police make a mistake as to the nature if the knife. In those cases where the weapon is wrongly alleged to be a “gravity knife” and there is no intent to use the knife in a criminal way, the case may be one which should be dismissed.