Violent Crimes

January 26, 2012

Manhattan DA Investigating Ray Kelly’s Son, New York City Newsman Greg Kelly, for Rape

Rookie term Manhattan District Attorney, Cyrus Vance, Jr., has found himself in a position that is anything but envious. According to multiple reports, DA Vance’s main referral source for business, New York City Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly, is also the father of an accused rapist. Greg Kelly, the co-host of Fox 5’s “Good Day New York,” is alleged to have raped a woman this past October in Manhattan. Although it is claimed that the alleged victim’s boyfriend initially confronted Commissioner Kelly about his son’s unwanted sexual conduct with his roughly thirty-year old girlfriend, the investigation was properly turned over to the District Attorney’s Office to ensure a fair and honest investigation by an agency with no ties to Greg Kelly. Far from atypical and likely the best decision for the investigation into the newsman’s guilt or innocence, Assistant District Attorney’s in the Sex Crimes Bureau will determine how and if the case will proceed to an arrest or indictment.

Obviously, Greg Kelly, through his counsel, strenuously denies the wrongdoing. Although any allegation of a sex crime is potentially debilitating and an embarrassing stigma, should the accused be convicted of a rape crime in New York the actual punishment is much worse than any public shame. While the manner in which Greg Kelly is accused of raping the complainant is not yet clear, there are generally three degrees of this crime. Regardless of the degree, rape must include penetration, aka “sexual intercourse,” even if slight.

January 19, 2012

Prosecuting a Domestic Assault Case without a Victim: The Excited Utterance Rule in New York

by Jeremy Saland

The common perception is that most of the work of a New York criminal attorney comes in zealously representing their clients at trial while trying to enter a reasonable doubt in the mind of a jury or a judge. While that is certainly a role played by criminal attorneys in New York, the truth is that many times experienced New York criminal lawyers raise challenges to a case at a much earlier stage. For instance, a criminal attorney may challenge the arrest itself as improper, or the sufficiency of the charges brought by the Assistant District Attorney. As most of you know, the police standard for making a proper arrest is probable cause. Furthermore, in New York an Assistant District Attorney (the prosecutor) must present non-hearsay factual allegations (e.g. a victim’s account, or a witness’ statement, or an arresting officers’ observations) that provide reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed each element of the offense being charged. It is important to note that the level of proof required at a stage prior to trial (to properly charge a defendant) is much lower than the reasonable doubt standard required to convict a defendant.

I presented the above background because I want to examine a recent New York criminal case, People v. Jamel Harris, 2011QN011459, NYLJ 1202503770549 at *1 (Crim., QU, Decided July 13, 2011), in which the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the charges brought against him because he believed they were based on uncorroborated hearsay. Mr. Harris, the defendant, was charged with Assault in the Third Degree, pursuant to NY PL 120.00(1), Harassment in the Second Degree pursuant to NY PL 240.26(1), Petit Larceny pursuant to NY PL 155.25 and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fifth Degree NY PL 165.40. A person is guilty of Assault in the Third Degree if he intended to, and did cause, physical injury to another person. Petit Larceny is when you steal property worth $1000 or less. Harassment in the Second Degree is established if the prosecution could show that the defendant was intending to annoy, alarm, or harass the victim by subjecting that person to physical conduct. And lastly, a person is guilty of Criminal Possession of Stolen Property if he/she knowingly possesses stolen property with the intent to benefit him/herself.

November 21, 2011

A Conspiracy of One: Understanding the New York Crimes Against Alleged Manhattan Pipe Bomb Terrorist Jose Pimentel

by Jeremy Saland

In a fairly atypical prosecution by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, Cyrus Vance, Jr. and Company are spearheading a case in Manhattan Criminal Court against alleged “lone wolf” terrorist, Jose Pimentel. It is alleged that Pimentel was a step or two away from detonating a shrapnel filled pipe bomb somewhere in New York City in retaliation against the military’s success against certain Muslim extremists. Pimentel faces up to twenty-five years in state prison if convicted not of the terrorism related offense that has galvanized the media, but for possessing an explosive type weapon.

According to reports, The New York City Police Department had been watching Pimentel for sometime after they learned of his alleged terroristic desires. In fact, it appears that Pimentel was the subject of NYPD scrutiny for well north of a year or two. While the story behind the investigation and ultimate arrest of Pimentel is fascinating, this blog entry will not address that investigation. Instead, the focus of this article is dissecting the offenses for which a Grand Jury may indict the accused.

November 1, 2011

New York Penal Law 120.00 Deals & Offers: Potential Lesser Pleas in New York Criminal Courts Part II

by Jeremy Saland

In a previous entry, I addressed the crime of Assault in the Third Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law 120.00 as well potential deals or offers one could expect in New York City courts (as well as elsewhere in the state). Once again, if you intentionally (or recklessly) cause physical injury to another individual and thereby cause substantial pain, you have perpetrated this misdemeanor crime. Although there are very important nuances to this statute that can and should be addressed by an experienced New York criminal lawyer, the purpose of this blog entry is not to address the crime itself, but deals one might expect from the prosecution.

Outside of an outright dismissal, procedural dismissal (“speedy trial” and CPL 30.30), or acquittal at trial, there are few options other possible dispositions beyond what was previously addressed. The three remaining dispositions are as follows:

October 24, 2011

The Confluence of Robbery & Weapon Crimes in the New York Penal Law: Possessing and Displaying a Firearm During a Theft

by Jeremy Saland

As discussed previously on this blog site, Robbery, under NY Penal Law section 160.00, is defined as “forcible stealing.” Thus it differs from other theft crimes for which force is not an element. In this legal context, “forcible” means threatening or using physical force. The force element can be satisfied in any number of ways: from a simple threatening fist pump and pushing a victim repeatedly into a corner to waiving a box cutter and brandishing a weapon in the victim’s face. Of course, if an alleged thief brandishes a “firearm” [i.e. a gun; for specific legal definition see: NY Penal Law 265.00(2)] at a Robbery in the New York City area or Westchester County, the severity of the crime is heightened. Any experienced New York criminal attorney knows that prosecutors in New York are tougher on defendants who perpetrate felonies while carrying firearms, guns, pistols or any type of weapon. If you brandish a weapon in New York during a forcible theft (i.e, a “Robbery”) you will, at the very least, face charges of Robbery in the Second Degree (NY Penal Law Section 160.10) – a class C felony with a possible sentence ranging from three and one half to fifteen years in prison – and you may face charges of Robbery in the First Degree (NY Penal Law Section 160.15) – a class B felony punishable from five to twenty five years in state prison. These terms of imprisonment are for first time offenders.

A critical component with regards to carrying a firearm during a Robbery, is whether that gun is loaded. Under NY Penal Law 160.10(2)(b) if a robber “displays what appears to be…a firearm” then that alleged robber will be convicted of Robbery in the Second degree. On the other hand, a defendant can only be convicted of Robbery in the First Degree if that firearm was loaded and “a shot readily capable of producing death or other serious physical injury could be discharged” (NY Penal Law 160.15(4)). Therefore, if what appears to be a gun is brandished during a Robbery and the defendant is charged with Robbery in the First Degree, a New York criminal lawyer will always raise the affirmative defense that the gun was not loaded (or not a gun at all) and thus not a deadly weapon. If it can not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm was indeed a loaded and deadly weapon, then the defendant may only be convicted of Robbery in the Second Degree. As noted above, this can mean significantly less time on a prison sentence especially when multiple counts/charges are levied against the defendant (as will almost always be the case).

August 3, 2011

New York Criminal Lawyers Obtain Dismissal of Burglary After Two Positive IDs in Line Up

by Jeremy Saland

There are few crimes in New York that are more serious than the crime of Burglary. Whether the allegation is that you perpetrated Burglary in the Third, Second or First Degree, there is potential for significant state prison. In fact, Burglary in the Second and First Degree have a mandatory minimum term of incarceration for first time offenders of three and one half and five years respectively. Make no mistake. Whomever your criminal lawyer may be, he or she must be both a skilled advocate and an attorney versed in the laws and procedures of New York criminal practice to successfully combat a Burglary arrest.

Briefly, you are guilty of Burglary when you trespass into a building and have the intent to commit a crime. Although any crime is included in this intent, prosecutors need not prove a specific intent to perpetrate a specific crime. Moreover, the degrees of Burglary are enhanced to violent felonies if, for example, the structure entered is a dwelling, you possessed a weapon or someone was injured while you committed the offense.

March 31, 2011

New York Penal Law 265.01(1): The “Metal Knuckle” & Brass Knuckle Criminal Dilema

by Jeremy Saland

One of the most common weapon crimes prosecuted in New York City is the misdemeanor offense of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree. This crime, New York Penal Law 265.01(1), sets forth and establishes certain objects that are automatically considered weapons regardless of whether or not you had the intent to use that object unlawfully against another person. In other words, if you possess any of these specified weapons, including the infamous “metal knuckle,” the police in New York City can arrest you or issue you a Desk Appearance Ticket for innocently possessing the object. Compounding matters, guidelines at District Attorney’s Offices may not permit an offer for even a first time offender.

In the realm of weapons set forth under NY PL 265.01(1), the most frequent weapon crime or arrest prosecuted by Assistant District Attorneys in New York City is probably an offense related to a switchblade knife or gravity knife. Often times, an individual is arrested or given a Desk Appearance Ticket after an undercover police officer observes the knife clip on the outside of the pocket. Once they stop and frisk that person, police officers confirm the knife opens with the force of gravity or springs open (your New York criminal lawyer should confirm this). Having said that, other weapons are also vigorously prosecuted including the “metal knuckle.”

March 27, 2011

No Criminal Record: New York Criminal Lawyers Get Disorderly Conduct After Clients Charged with Burglary in the Second Degree (NY PL 140.25)

by Jeremy Saland

Sometimes prosecutors can be all “bark” and no “bite.” In the case of two clients charged with Burglary in the Second Degree (New York Penal Law 140.25), this was precisely the situation. Prosecutors claimed that our clients committed the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree after they allegedly went to a neighbor’s home, got into a physical altercation and broke out a window. If convicted, the clients each faced a minimum of 3.5 years and a maximum of 15 years in state prison. Despite the allegations, our clients adamantly denied going into the complainant’s home, attacking the complainant or breaking a window in the home. In fact, one of our clients sustained a much more significant injury than the alleged victim and suffered a deep laceration requiring sutures as well as various other lacerations inconsistent with the breaking of window glass. Further investigation revealed that although they were present at the location of the incident, another person was initially arrested and released.

At arraignment, the New York criminal lawyers at Saland Law PC convinced the judge to release our clients. Upon their release, Saland Law PC argued with prosecutors over the merits of the case as well as the evidence. After some time, prosecutors offered an “A” misdemeanor and probation to each of our clients. They even claimed it was a “one time offer.” Upon rejecting that offer because of the strong evidence in our clients’ favor, prosecutors stated they would proceed on a felony and scheduled a date for a felony hearing.

March 22, 2011

New York Penal Law Article 121: Strangulation and Related Offenses Information Page

by Jeremy Saland

While Assault, Burglary, Robbery and Weapon Possession are the more common violent crimes prosecuted by Assistant District Attorneys in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and other offices in the New York City region, crimes relating to strangulation are also “on the books.” In fact, pursuant to Article 121 of the New York Penal Law, Strangulation and Related Offenses includes three crimes. These crimes are Criminal Obstruction of Breathing or Blood Circulation (NY PL 121.11), Strangulation in the Second Degree (NY PL 121.12) and Strangulation in the First Degree (NY PL 121.13).

Because these crimes are relatively new and there is not a significant amount of information about them, Saland Law PC has created an educational website page not for advice purposes, but to educate readers on the law in this area. Obviously, should you be accused of or arrested for this or any other crime, contact a New York criminal lawyer to address the evidence against you as well as the applicable criminal law that you may face.

February 10, 2011

Misdemeanor Assault in the Third Degree (NY Penal Law 120.00): Potential Deals & Offers for Assault in New York Criminal Courts Part I

by Jeremy Saland

Whether you were arrested for Third Degree Assault (New York Penal Law 120.00) or you were given an Assault Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) in the New York City area, the potential offers or deals are ultimately the same. Certainly, one New York criminal defense attorney may have a different approach to get the best deal over another lawyer, but the potential crimes and violations you may obtain are all found in the New York Penal Law.

Generally, Assault in the Third Degree (NY PL 120.00) is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail. In New York City (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx), that year for an Assault arrest and conviction would be served on Rikers Island. Obviously, your New York criminal lawyer will advocate fiercely to prevent that from happening. So, assuming that you cannot beat the case on factual, legal or procedural grounds, what are the potential offers you can expect to discuss with your New York criminal defense attorney? The following is a list of those dispositions: